At Kettle Club we’ve observed that Audemars Piguet has become a beacon of interest for collectors, especially as the brand celebrates its 150th anniversary. Audemars Piguet’s storied legacy, innovative watches and exclusivity place it in the highest echelons of Swiss watchmaking. But how did AP earn its prestige and how does it stack up against a household name like Rolex? In this in depth exploration we delve into AP’s history and iconic models, then compare these two luxury giants, highlighting their similarities, differences and why a collector might choose Audemars Piguet over Rolex (and vice versa).
History of Audemars Piguet
Founded in 1875 in the Swiss village of Le Brassus, Audemars Piguet was born from the partnership of two childhood friends, Jules-Louis Audemars and Edward-Auguste Piguet. From the outset, they split responsibilities, Audemars handled technical watchmaking and production, while Piguet managed sales and administration. Remarkably the company has remained independent and family owned ever since, now helmed by the founders’ fourth generation descendants. This continuity makes AP unique in a landscape where many rivals are part of large conglomerates.
In 1892 Audemars Piguet developed the world’s first minute repeating movement for a wristwatch. This minute repeater complication, which chimes the hours, quarters and minutes on demand was a bold technical achievement in an era dominated by pocket watches. It set the tone for AP’s pioneering spirit. Over the decades Audemars Piguet pushed boundaries with ultra thin calibres and complex mechanisms. For example AP introduced the first jump hour wristwatch in 1921 and the first self winding (automatic) tourbillon wristwatch in 1986, feats that cemented its reputation in haute horlogerie.
Another defining chapter in AP’s history came in 1972 with the launch of the Royal Oak. Designed by Gérald Genta, the Royal Oak fundamentally revolutionised the concept of the luxury sports watch. At a time when the Swiss watch industry was reeling from the Quartz Crisis, AP’s audacious decision was to craft a high-end sports watch in stainless steel, priced on par with gold watches. The Royal Oak’s now-famous features, an octagonal bezel secured by eight exposed screws, a textured “tapisserie” guilloché dial and an integrated steel bracelet, broke all the traditional rules of fine watch design. Initial skepticism gave way to success and the Royal Oak not only saved Audemars Piguet’s fortunes but also spawned an entire genre of luxury steel sports watches across the industry. The impact was tangible, AP’s workforce grew from just a few dozen to over 100 artisans after the Royal Oak’s debut, foreshadowing the brand’s rapid growth in the modern era.
Fast-forward to today, Audemars Piguet remains one of the world’s most respected watchmakers. It produces a relatively small number of pieces each year (tens of thousands, compared to Rolex’s nearly one million-plus), maintaining an emphasis on quality and exclusivity over volume. AP is often cited as part of the Swiss watchmaking “Holy Trinity”, alongside Patek Philippe and Vacheron Constantin, renowned for an unwavering commitment to craftsmanship and innovation. Even after 150 years, Audemars Piguet stays at the cutting edge: the company has experimented with creative collaborations (for instance, partnering with Marvel Comics to create heroic-themed limited editions) and works with cultural icons as brand ambassadors. Through it all, AP’s identity as a family led maison devoted to haute horlogerie has remained intact.
Iconic Audemars Piguet Watches
When enthusiasts hear “Audemars Piguet,” the first watch that comes to mind is invariably the Royal Oak. This flagship model, introduced in 1972, has achieved icon status in design and collector circles. The Royal Oak’s bold and distinctive features have become AP’s signature. Its octagonal bezel (inspired by a ship’s porthole) is secured by eight white-gold screws, creating a unique industrial elegance. The dial features the Grande Tapisserie pattern, a fine guilloché motif of interlocking tiny squares, which is painstakingly machined and gives the watch a rich visual texture. With a case and bracelet hand-finished to mix satin-brushed and polished surfaces, the Royal Oak was the first luxury watch to elevate stainless steel to an art form, proving that high horology isn’t reserved only for precious metals. Early Royal Oaks were ultra-thin as well, housing a movement only 3.05 mm thick, reflecting AP’s ongoing quest for technical elegance. Today, the Royal Oak collection has expanded to dozens of variations, from simple time-and-date models to complications like chronographs, perpetual calendars and tourbillons, yet all share that same unmistakable design DNA.
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Perpetual Calendar in rose gold. The Royal Oak’s signature octagonal bezel and “Tapisserie” dial exemplify AP’s blend of avant-garde design and traditional craftsmanship. This high-complication model displays AP’s mastery in combining useful functions (like a perpetual calendar) with luxurious style.
Building on the Royal Oak’s success, Audemars Piguet launched the Royal Oak Offshore in 1993 as a beefed-up, sportier cousin. The Offshore took the Royal Oak’s design codes and made them more aggressive, larger case sizes, rubber seals and straps and a muscular aesthetic aimed at a younger generation and extreme sports enthusiasts. With its bold presence, the Offshore helped pioneer the trend for oversized luxury sports watches. Not stopping there, AP also introduced the Royal Oak Concept series in 2002. The Concept models are cutting-edge “laboratory” pieces where Audemars Piguet showcases futuristic materials, exotic complications (like highly complex tourbillons and even acoustic chiming innovations) and avant-garde designs that push the Royal Oak form to its limits. These Concept watches, often made in limited numbers, underline AP’s status as an innovator unafraid to experiment.
Outside of the Royal Oak family, Audemars Piguet has produced many other notable models, albeit in more niche circles. The Jules Audemars line (named after the co-founder) offered classic round dress watches with elegant complications. The Millenary collection introduced a distinctive oval case and off-centre dial, highlighting AP’s artistic side in modern watchmaking. In 2019, AP made waves with a completely new collection: Code 11.59. This was Audemars Piguet’s first major non-Royal Oak line in decades, aiming to reassert AP in the arena of contemporary dress watches. The Code 11.59 pieces feature round cases but with an embedded octagonal middle case (a subtle homage to the Royal Oak’s shape), intricate curved crystal profiles and a slew of new in-house movements. Initial reactions were mixed, but AP has continually refined the Code 11.59 designs and they now demonstrate the brand’s ability to blend modern design with mechanical excellence. From ultra-thin grand complications to robust sports chronographs, Audemars Piguet’s watch range showcases a mix of technical mastery and aesthetic daring, all underpinned by the meticulous hand-finishing that the brand is known for.
Audemars Piguet vs Rolex: Key Differences and Similarities
Both Audemars Piguet and Rolex stand at the pinnacle of Swiss luxury watchmaking, but they do so with very different philosophies. Comparing the two is a fascinating study in contrast. Below we break down the comparison into key aspects, from craftsmanship and design to technology, exclusivity and why each brand resonates with watch lovers.
Craftsmanship and Quality
One fundamental difference between AP and Rolex lies in how their watches are made and finished. Audemars Piguet is all about artisanal craftsmanship. With a much smaller annual production (around 50,000 pieces per year versus Rolex’s near 1 million), AP dedicates far more time to finishing each watch by hand. In fact, it’s been estimated that an AP watch might involve 30–100 watchmaker hours of labor, whereas a Rolex might involve 3–6 hours due to more industrialised processes. This is not to say Rolex lacks quality, far from it, but AP’s approach means that you’ll find fine decorative techniques in its watches that are usually reserved for the highest echelons of haute horlogerie. For instance, Audemars Piguet is celebrated for hand-finishing its movements with Côtes de Genève (Geneva stripes on bridges), perlage (circular graining on plates), anglage (hand-polished beveled edges) and other traditional embellishments. When you peer into the caseback of an AP (many of which have sapphire exhibition backs), it’s like viewing a tiny art gallery of mechanical craft. The dials and cases receive similar attention: the Royal Oak’s guilloché tapisserie dial is a perfect example of decorative craft meeting function and every bevel on the octagonal bezel is impeccably polished by hand. All of this gives Audemars Piguet watches a jewelled, intricate feel, they are as much hand-made masterpieces as they are timekeepers.
Rolex, in contrast, prides itself on precision manufacturing and robustness. Rolex watches are built to extremely high quality standards, but the processes are more automated and industrial, reflecting Rolex’s philosophy of making reliable watches in larger volumes without sacrificing excellence. Rolex uses advanced machinery and technology to achieve uniform quality. Notably, Rolex has its own foundry and formulates a proprietary high-grade steel alloy called 904L stainless steel (Oystersteel), which is harder and more corrosion-resistant than typical watch steels. This steel, along with Rolex’s patented Rolesor metal (a steel and gold hybrid construction for two-tone models), exemplifies the brand’s emphasis on durability and long-term wear. Every Rolex movement is assembled with great care (often by technicians with the aid of automation for certain tasks) and is tuned to meet or exceed chronometer accuracy standards. While Rolex movements generally lack the hand-finished decoration of AP’s, they are famous for being workhorses, robust, shock-resistant and capable of keeping excellent time over decades of use. In terms of craftsmanship, one might say Audemars Piguet focuses on artisanal finesse, whereas Rolex focuses on unassailable function. Both brands have unbelievable quality control; it’s just expressed differently. An AP is a functional piece of art, whereas a Rolex is often described as the ultimate functional tool watch and both descriptions are compliments in their own right.
Design Philosophy and Aesthetics
The design languages of Audemars Piguet and Rolex are markedly different, each appealing to different tastes. Audemars Piguet’s design ethos is avant-garde and bold. Historically, AP has not shied away from unconventional designs, the Royal Oak being the prime example of a disruptive design that became timeless. AP watches often feature eye-catching elements: openworked (skeleton) dials where you can see the movement’s inner workings, octagonal or otherwise non-round cases and high-complication displays that showcase technical prowess. Even AP’s dressier models (like some Code 11.59 editions) tend to include contemporary flairs, such as smoked fumé dials or complex case geometry. The brand’s willingness to push creative boundaries means that an Audemars Piguet on the wrist is a statement of individuality and appreciation for cutting-edge design. A collector drawn to AP often loves the intricate details, e.g. the “Mega Tapisserie” larger dial pattern on an Offshore, or the forged carbon cases AP introduced on some models and enjoys that AP designs can spark conversation. There is also an element of exclusivity in AP’s aesthetics: because they produce fewer watches and often introduce limited editions, owning an AP (especially a non-mainstream model) feels like owning a rare piece of modern art.
Rolex’s aesthetic, on the other hand, is rooted in timeless, classic design with a purpose. Rolex watches tend to have clean, traditional dial layouts and conservative case designs that have evolved only gradually over decades. The emphasis is on legibility, balance and enduring style rather than on being avant-garde. Signature Rolex touches, the iconic Mercedes-style hands on sport models, the Cyclops magnification lens over the date, the fluted gold bezel on a Datejust or Day-Date, the simple oyster bracelet, all contribute to a look that is instantly recognisable yet never ostentatious. Rolex sticks to round cases for essentially all its models (aside from the rare Cellini Prince of the past), reinforcing a consistent visual identity. Even when Rolex uses precious materials or gems, the designs remain tasteful and not overly ornate. The brand’s design consistency is such that a 1960s Rolex and a 2020s Rolex share a clear lineage of style. Many would say a Rolex is equally at home with a suit or with a T-shirt, in other words, the versatility of the design is key. By focusing on perfecting a core design (the Oyster case and bracelet concept, for instance), Rolex has achieved a very high level of refinement and understated elegance. People who choose Rolex often appreciate that the designs don’t go out of fashion; a Submariner or a Datejust looks as good today as it did half a century ago. In summary, Audemars Piguet appeals to those who enjoy bold, artistic watch designs that stand out, while Rolex appeals to those who favour a timeless, go-anywhere aesthetic that subtly exudes success and reliability.
Innovations and Complications vs. Practical Technology
Both AP and Rolex have rich legacies of innovation, but the types of innovation they pursue can differ significantly. Audemars Piguet’s innovations often lie in the realm of high horology, that is, pushing mechanical complexity and artistry. We’ve mentioned several already: AP pioneered complications like minute repeaters for wristwatches, jumping hours and the first automatic tourbillon. The brand has produced many Grande Complication watches that combine tourbillon, perpetual calendar and split-second chronograph functions into one, essentially creating portable masterpieces that showcase what mechanical watchmaking can do. Audemars Piguet is also known for developing ultra-thin movements; for example, its Calibre 2120/2121 (used in early Royal Oaks) was one of the thinnest full-rotor automatic movements in the world. In recent years, AP’s Royal Oak Concept line has featured experimental uses of materials (like alacrite and forged carbon) and advanced engineering such as novel shock absorption for movements and even concepts like the Supersonnerie, a minute repeater design that dramatically improves sound volume and clarity. These are the kinds of cutting-edge horological innovations that appeal to purists and collectors who admire watches as works of technical art. In essence, Audemars Piguet often treats the watch as a canvas for ingenuity: showing off intricate complications, high beat movements, or multi-barrel power reserves to extend power duration, etc. If you’re fascinated by what makes a mechanical watch internally interesting, AP offers plenty to explore.
Rolex’s innovations, by contrast, tend to focus on practicality, reliability and improving the real-world utility of their watches. Rolex has a storied history of technical firsts that are less about complication for complication’s sake and more about solving problems or enhancing durability. For example, Rolex invented the first truly waterproof watch case, the Oyster case in 1926, which set a new standard for water resistance in wristwatches. In 1931, Rolex introduced the Perpetual rotor, one of the first successful self-winding mechanisms for a wristwatch, eliminating the need to manually wind daily. In the 1950s and 60s, as tool watches came to the fore, Rolex was at the vanguard: they co-developed the helium escape valve for the Sea-Dweller in the 1960s (to help saturation divers safely use the watch during decompression). They also pioneered high-magnetism resistance with the Milgauss, high-depth water resistance with the Submariner and Deepsea and multiple time zone tracking with the GMT-Master. In modern times, Rolex focuses on incremental innovation: things like the Parachrom hairspring (an alloy that makes the watch movement more resistant to shocks and magnetic fields, or the Chronergy escapement (improving efficiency and power reserve in movements). Rolex does not produce elaborate complications like minute repeaters or tourbillons; in fact, Rolex’s most complex regular production watch is the Sky-Dweller, which is an annual calendar and GMT, relatively simple compared to AP’s grand comps. This is by design: Rolex prioritises features that keep their watches reliable under all conditions. So, while AP might wow you with a visible tourbillon whirring on the dial, Rolex impresses by making a watch that you can take from office to ocean and it just works. Both brands innovate, but AP’s innovations speak to the artistry and complexity of watchmaking, whereas Rolex’s innovations speak to usability and toughness in everyday life.
Production, Exclusivity and Collectibility
Production volume plays a huge role in the brand image of AP versus Rolex. Audemars Piguet produces far fewer watches annually than Rolex and this scarcity is part of AP’s allure. With only on the order of 40–50,000 watches made per year, AP simply isn’t a mass-market brand, they target connoisseurs and collectors. This limited supply means many Audemars Piguet models (especially popular ones like the Royal Oak “Jumbo” Extra-Thin or certain limited editions) can be very hard to obtain at retail. It’s not uncommon for AP’s boutique allocations to be fully spoken for by VIP clients. This strategy of intentional limited production creates an aura of exclusivity around Audemars Piguet. If you wear an AP, especially a rarer model, it’s quite likely you won’t run into another person with the same watch, an appealing thought for those who value uniqueness. Collectibility is accordingly high: certain AP references (for example, discontinued Royal Oak models or special collaborations like the AP x Marvel Black Panther edition) have shot up in value and are chased by enthusiasts worldwide. AP also nurtures collectibility by doing a lot of limited releases and special series (they even have an AP House concept for client experience, underlining a club-like exclusivity). Vintage AP pieces, though relatively niche compared to vintage Rolex, are prized by knowledgeable collectors, a vintage AP perpetual calendar or chronograph from mid-20th century might not be broadly famous, but within the community, they are grail-level watches due to how few were made.
Rolex, however, walks a different line: it produces a lot of watches (roughly a million per year by some estimates) but still manages to be perceived as exclusive. How? First, that volume is spread over many model lines and global demand is enormous, so certain desirable Rolex models are perpetually in short supply. A stainless steel Daytona or Submariner date, for instance, often has a waiting list despite Rolex’s production volume. Unlike AP, Rolex doesn’t typically number most limited editions (in fact, Rolex rarely acknowledges making limited editions at all, except unique pieces for charity auctions). Yet the collectibility of Rolex is legendary. Vintage Rolex sports models have an entire cottage industry of passionate collectors and auction prices for rare vintage Rolexes (Paul Newman Daytonas, Comex Submariners, MilSubs, etc.) can rival or exceed anything in the watch world. Modern Rolex models also tend to hold or increase in value if they are in high demand. Importantly, Rolex has achieved universal brand recognition, so the pool of potential collectors is vast, from seasoned horologists to casual buyers who just know “Rolex is the best.” This means almost any Rolex, especially sports models, have a very liquid secondary market. By contrast, AP’s secondary market is a bit more concentrated around its flagship models; for example, a Royal Oak will generally hold value or appreciate strongly (many current Royal Oaks trade well above retail), whereas some of AP’s dressier or less-known models might not have the same broad demand. That said, both AP and Rolex share the trait that many of their watches sell for a premium on the secondary market, a testament to how sought-after they are. In summary, Audemars Piguet offers built-in exclusivity through limited production and a smaller collector base, which can make owning an AP feel like being in a rarified club. Rolex offers ubiquitous prestige, it’s a watch that almost everyone recognises, yet owning the right reference still imparts a sense of achievement due to the difficulty of acquisition and the storied heritage behind it.
Brand Prestige and Why People Choose AP or Rolex
When it comes to overall brand prestige, both AP and Rolex rank extremely high, but in somewhat different ways. Audemars Piguet’s prestige is often strongest among serious watch enthusiasts (“watch geeks,” if you will). Because AP is part of the Holy Trinity of watchmaking and produces high-complication pieces, it commands respect for its technical and artistic achievements. Telling a fellow collector that you own an AP, especially a significant model like a Royal Oak “Jumbo” or a grand complication, signals that you have a deep appreciation for horology. AP is also seen as a bit more exclusive and fashion-forward, helped by its partnerships with famous athletes, artists and celebrities. For instance, icons like Jay-Z, LeBron James and Serena Williams have been associated with Audemars Piguet. These collaborations and endorsements give AP an image of creative luxury, a brand for those “in the know” who value artistry and are willing to step outside the mainstream. Many people choose Audemars Piguet because owning one feels like joining a tradition of connoisseurship; it’s a brand that friends who are collectors will deeply appreciate even if the general public might not notice the watch immediately. The flip side is that AP can sometimes fly under the radar, which for many owners is a plus. A Royal Oak isn’t as instantly recognised by the average person as a Rolex is, but someone versed in watches will definitely take notice. This lends Audemars Piguet a sort of insider prestige and a subtlety that appeals to those who want something more uncommon on their wrist.
Rolex’s prestige, in contrast, is truly universal. The brand’s name is virtually synonymous with success and luxury; you could go to nearly any country and the name “Rolex” is recognised and respected. Rolex has cultivated this status by over a century of relentless focus on quality, plus savvy marketing (Rolex has long been associated with explorers, sports champions, movie stars and world leaders). People often choose Rolex because it’s a proven symbol of achievement, whether it’s a retirement gift, a reward for a personal milestone, or a daily reminder of one’s success, a Rolex carries that connotation openly. Additionally, because Rolex designs are classic and not overly showy, they project success without being seen as gaudy. There’s a saying that “you never actually own a Patek Philippe, you merely take care of it for the next generation”, if we adapt that spirit, one might say you never truly regret buying a Rolex, because its value (both monetary and sentimental) endures so reliably. The broad service network and relatively easier maintenance of Rolex (given the large number of trained watchmakers who can service them) is another practical reason someone might choose Rolex for a long-term investment in a watch. In short, Rolex’s prestige is that of a status symbol that’s immediately understood, backed by the confidence that the watch will be precise and tough enough for any situation.
Importantly, there’s overlap too: both AP and Rolex owners share a love of fine watches and both brands adorn the wrists of the famous and accomplished. Neither is a “second tier” to the other in any objective way, it truly comes down to personal preference, taste and priorities.
Why Choose Audemars Piguet vs. Why Choose Rolex?
Ultimately, deciding between Audemars Piguet and Rolex is like choosing between two different philosophies of luxury watch. Here’s a quick breakdown of why a collector or buyer might lean towards one or the other:
Why Choose Audemars Piguet?
-
- Exclusivity & Craftsmanship: You value the hand-finished details and artisanal quality that comes with AP’s limited production. Each AP feels truly special, with techniques like hand-polished movements and dials that showcase traditional craftsmanship.
- Haute Horlogerie Heritage: You appreciate complications and watchmaking artistry. AP’s status in the Holy Trinity of watchmakers means you’re getting a piece of that high-horology legacy, whether it’s a historic complication or an innovative concept watch.
- Avant-Garde Design: You prefer a bold or unique design that stands out from the crowd. The Royal Oak’s iconic look or the futuristic feel of AP’s concept pieces appeal to your creative side more than classic styles. Wearing an AP signals a connoisseur’s taste, it’s a functional piece of art on your wrist.
- Collector’s Appeal: You enjoy the idea of owning a watch that not everyone can get. Limited editions, collaborations (like AP’s celebrity co-designed models) and relatively low numbers make AP watches highly collectible. There’s a certain thrill in hunting down an Audemars Piguet reference and knowing it’s a rarer find.
Why Choose Rolex?- Reliability & Precision: You want a watch that is virtually worry free and can handle daily wear (and even abuse) while keeping superb time. Rolex’s movements are famed for their robustness and accuracy under all conditions. A Rolex can be serviced anywhere in the world and it’s built to last generations with minimal fuss.
- Timeless Versatility: You gravitate towards classic design and all-purpose versatility. A Submariner can be worn with a diving wetsuit or a business suit and never look out of place. Rolex designs hardly ever go “out of style,” so you know your watch will be as elegant in 20 years as it is today.
- Brand Prestige & Recognition: You value the cachet that comes with the Rolex name. The iconic crown logo and the word “ROLEX” on the dial are instantly recognised symbols of success. If you want a luxury watch that impresses virtually anyone at a glance, Rolex’s universal prestige is a major draw.
- Value Retention & Investment: While both brands hold value well, Rolex has a track record as one of the safest buys in luxury watches. Many Rolex models appreciate over time or at least retain value and there is always a robust market if you decide to sell or trade. It’s a watch you can wear and enjoy daily, often without worrying about depreciation, in fact, some treat certain Rolex models as investments.
In the end comparing Audemars Piguet and Rolex is less about declaring a “winner” and more about understanding what speaks to you as a watch enthusiast. Audemars Piguet offers an experience of haute horlogerie, owning an AP means strapping on a slice of art, history and innovative engineering on your wrist, with an air of exclusivity and avant-garde flair. Rolex, meanwhile, represents the pinnacle of classic luxury, it’s the watch for all seasons, blending tradition, reliability and universal esteem in equal measure. Both brands share a commitment to excellence, just expressed through different avenues. Whether you find yourself enchanted by the intricate tapisserie dial of a Royal Oak or the ever‑steady tick of a Rolex Oyster Perpetual, you really cannot go wrong. The choice between Audemars Piguet and Rolex ultimately comes down to personal taste, your connection to each brand’s story and how you envision your horological journey. And if you’re lucky enough to eventually own one of each, you’ll enjoy the best of both worlds, one watch an avant-garde conversation piece, the other a timeless icon, each reminding you why Swiss watchmaking continues to captivate generation after generation.
Citations
https://www.vogue.co.uk/bc/150-years-of-audemars-piguet-celebrating-trailblazing-time-and-exceptional-women#:~:text=AP%20counts%20a%20century%20and,technical%20exercises%3B%20they%20were%20bold
audemarspiguet.comaudemarspiguet.com
https://www.stanhopeinsurance.co.uk/blog/blog/history-of-audemars-piguet/#:~:text=When%20the%20company%20launched%20the,has%20over%202%2C000%20employees%20worldwide
Box & Papers
